If Wiggo misses the 2014 Tour, he only has himself to blame

this article originally appeared on The Roar

Love-Le-Tour

Bradly Wiggins is “arrogant,” conceals himself in a “gruff geezer cloak,” and so dominated the atmosphere around the 2012 Team Sky Tour de France squad that the others on the team had to “ride around his moods like he was a traffic island.”

These are the words of Christopher Froome, written in his new autobiography, The Climb, which is currently being serialized in the British newspaper The Times.

In the book, Froome goes on to explain that he was not invited to the ‘Yellow Ball’ that Wiggins threw later in the year to celebrate his victory, nor was he given his share of the bonus that is traditionally dished out to the riders on the winner’s team.

Wiggins strives to give off the impression that he hasn’t got much time for what other people think, but in this case he’d best be bothered, as Froome is Sky’s main man for the 2014 Tour de France and will start the race as the favorite. Froome has a great chance to defend his 2013 title and if he is not pivotal in helping to choose the team to support his attempt it would come as a great surprise.

There was a sense in 2013 that Dave Brailsford, Sky’s man behind the controls, owed Froome for his riding for Wiggins in 2012. Froome, for his part, entered that race, which eventually saw Wiggins emerge as the first ever English winner, fully expecting to be able to go for the Yellow Jersey himself, if the opportunity arose.

In 2011 it was touch and go as to whether Froome would stay with Sky, but contractual talks with Brailsford left Froome certain that he would be an equal to Wiggins in the 2012 race.

In the end however, Froome came to realize that he was always set to be Wiggins’ super-domestique in that edition, and felt that Brailsford had not been fully forthcoming with the plans he had seemingly already formulated.

“Dave’s approach was rather like a character in Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking Glass,” Froome says. “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – ‘neither more nor less’. My understanding was that I would go to the Tour as a protected rider but the details were never teased out. Dave’s words would mean just what he chose them to mean.

“I realised, at last, that everything had been geared towards this,” he writes. “It was never going to be any different. The story was completed long before we got to France. Bradley wins. The book is written. The documentary is made. The promise is fulfilled. We had just been acting it out.”

Cue 2013 and Wiggins is having a stinker but Froome is replicating his teammate’s previous season to a large extent, winning a series of important stage races through the year and stamping his credentials as Sky’s leader long before the Tour. The potential fireworks that might have come from a Wiggo/Froome battle royale at the Tour never come close to being realized. In the end, Froome dominates the Tour and wins at a canter.

Fast forward to 2014 and Wiggo seems to be back at somewhere near his best after a win at the Tour of California. Realising a desire still existed to partake in another Tour de France, Wiggins started to make conciliatory noises in the direction of his team and Froome, saying he was ready to doff his chapeau and tow the party line.

“I’d love to be back at the Tour de France. That’s the long-term goal – to be part of that successful team,” he said back in April.

“I missed it last year and had to watch it on the TV. When you see it from the outside then you see just how great the Tour de France is. Obviously there’s a huge opportunity with it starting in the UK this year. Coming back as a former winner and it being there is fantastic.”

In March Wiggo gave an interview to The Independent in which he stated his ntention, if he were to be included in the Tour team, to support Froome.

“There were a couple of times last year when Chris was really isolated and I want to be in a position that I can be there when that happens,” he said.

Taking these words at face value one could argue that Wiggins has had a change in attitude and is now willing to defer to Froome, who has proven to be superior in consistency as well as longevity in the past two years.

However, Wiggins’ appeals to Brailsford and Froome – which is exactly what his words in the press amount to – appear rather hollow and desperate to most observers. Froome’s comments in his autobiography are his own personal opinion of course but they echo what many cycling fans have been saying on club runs and on cycling forums for some time.

The timing of the release of Froome’s book couldn’t come at a worse nor a more embarrassing time for Wiggins, sitting as he is on the bench hoping to be picked for the Tour roster.

Brailsford may have felt like he owed Froome the team leadership in 2013 but he is a man with little time for sentiment, and this time around he knows that he has a rider capable of bringing Sky their third Tour win in three years, something that would be a remarkable achievement by any standard.

He also knows that Froome needs to be protected from friction, and that he has men like Richie Porte to support him. Also, if and when the big men step up and Froome does become isolated, the Kenyan-born Briton has already shown he can handle himself perfectly well alone.

The truth is that Wiggins has an ego the size of a jumbo jet, but one made out of egg shells. He is a winner, yes, and a fine bike rider, but he is also tetchy, rude, petulant and divisive when he wants to be.

Of the day in the Alps in 2012 when he rode away from Wiggins, Froome writes that he could not understand the furore his actions created. As far as he was concerned, he was defending the Yellow for Sky, meaning that whether it was to ultimately rest on his or Wiggin’s shoulders, the important thing was just to win it.

“Brad was folding physically and mentally, and quicker than I had thought possible,” he writes. “I got the feeling that he would literally just get off his bike were I to carry on pushing. What was a simple and perfect plan to me seemed to translate for Brad into a public humiliation.”

And there you have it. Wiggins is just not a team player. He was not in the Sky recce team that went to ride the Yorkshire stages recently, not the one that went to scout out the cobbles.

If Wiggins is not invited to ride on the Sky team for 2014, he really only has himself to blame.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 comments

  1. Rick

    Enjoyed your article as always , I agree with your assessment of Wiggins. I want to like Froome but his riding style is so ugly I can’t stand to watch him. I’ve yet to read an explanation of why he drops his head down every 5 seconds. You can look at your computer without completely dropping your head to the point where you can barely see the race in front of you. All this talk of marginal gains and yet he’s wasting lots of energy lifting his head up and down. Can you come up with a reason or is it just a nervous tic?

    • crankpunk

      dunno Rick, he did it again yesterday be4 attacking too. whenever i see him i always laugh at that April Fool’s article from last year about how he;d had his biceps surgically removed to save weight ;-) whatever he is doing, seems to be working…

  2. velocodger

    Probably not many English-speaking folks saw Wiggins at his worst on French television during the 2012 Tour. France 3 had just finished a 1/2 hour homage to English cycling, with clips of Tom Simpson, among others. The commentator had put on sideburns as a tribute to Wiggins. His response? Nothing but insults! His replied to the adulation; “you don’t like the English, do you?” (in French to be sure the whole nation knew they had been insulted.) He couldn’t have acted more the ass if he tried. I was floored. I speculate that in the early days of Aicar use, the dosages had not been worked out, and Bradley suffered from side effects.

  3. Noel

    Here’s an alternative scenario – Wiggins won the timetrial -heavy 2012 Tour by 3.21. Who’s to say that Froome would have made that difference up if he’d been givien the licence? we just don’t know, and why would the Sky management, who had a tried, tested and proven winner in the yellow jersey, ever risk their multi-million £ investment on someone unfamiliar with all the media-hype/demands/pressures surrounding a race leader. The whole season had been built on getting Wiggins used to being race leader in a number of stage races, and a team getting used to protecting that lead. Suddenly the No2, fuelled by an ambitious manager/partner decides to ignore the obvious and chuck a spanner in the works, but thankfully backs down once Yates/Brailsford tell him what’s expected. He then plays a dutiful but sulky act into Paris. ‘as far as he was concerned he was just protecting the yellow…’ yeah right.

    at the end of the day, Brailsford has got himself two huge talents and resultant egos on his hands, and isn’t managing that very well if each side has to resort to book releases, and BBC interviews to get their side of the story across. Wiggo may rub a lot of people up the wrong way, but he and Cav (+ Hoy and Trott) are the big cycling stars in the UK (sorry Chris, but it’s true), and if he doesn’t line up in Yorkshire then Sky management may want to ask Brailsford how on earth he’s let that happen… from a purely athletic point-of-view he deserves a spot…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s